View:
                   SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
        PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant  [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted
     by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[ ]  Definitive Proxy Statement
[X]  Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 240.14a-11(c) or Rule
     240.14a-12

                KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
        (NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[ ]  $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1),
     14a-6(i)(2) or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.

[ ]  $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange
     Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3).

[ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules
     14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

     (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction
          applies:

     (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
          applies:

     (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
          computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:

     (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     (5)  Total fee paid:

[X]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
     Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for
     which the offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the
     previous filing by registration statement number, or the
     Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

     (1)  Amount Previously Paid:

     (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

     (3)  Filing Party:

     (4)  Date Filed:



                     Take A Close Look:
               Western's Promises Don't Add Up
        The KCPL/UtiliCorp Merger is the Only Choice
                                                            
                                              April 21, 1996

Dear Shareholder:

     In a last-minute attempt to derail the formation of a
formidable competitor, Western Resources, Inc. has submitted
an ill-conceived proposal to merge with Kansas City Power &
Light Company in an exchange of each share of your KCPL
stock for a fraction of a share of Western common stock.
After careful deliberation, including consultation with your
Company's independent financial, legal and regulatory
experts, your Board has unanimously concluded that Western's
proposal is not in your best interests.

     Accordingly, the Board has determined not to pursue a
merger with Western, reaffirming its commitment to the
strategic merger of KCPL with UtiliCorp United Inc.  The
Board strongly urges you to approve the UtiliCorp merger by
signing, dating and mailing the enclosed WHITE proxy card
today.

     The proposed KCPL/UtiliCorp merger represents the
culmination of years of work, planning and pursuing a long-
term business strategy to enhance the growth of the Company
and the value of your shares.  The merger agreement with
UtiliCorp was reached only after your Board considered  a
number of opportunities and was satisfied that a
KCPL/UtiliCorp combination was the best way to build value
for you by enhancing  near and long-term business prospects
for the Company.

     In contrast to your Company's proposed merger with
UtiliCorp, the Western proposal is the latest in a series of
transaction-driven ideas, devoid of a long-term strategic
rationale, from a management team that boasts about doing
"about a deal a month for the past year."

     Your Board has determined that Western's proposal  is
premised on a series of fundamentally flawed assumptions and
estimates.  Western would have you believe that it is
offering $28 in value per KCPL share along with a
substantially increased dividend. Take a closer look.

- -    Western's synergy claims are inflated.  The value of
  Western's proposal is dependent upon Western's ability to
  achieve over $1 billion in savings.  You should know that,
  less than a year ago, Western estimated savings of less than
  half that amount.  It is clear to us that Western
  manipulated its proposal to create the illusion of value.

- -    Western's merger assumptions are unrealistic.  In
  addition to inflating the potential amount of merger
  savings, Western says it expects that regulatory authorities
  will allow it to retain 70% of its estimated merger
  benefits.  You should know that in today's environment,
  regulators typically allow utilities to retain only 50% or
  less of these savings.  In fact, Western is under a Kansas
  order that states "sharing of savings will be on a 50/50
  basis."

- -    Western's promised dividend increases are questionable.
  If Western can't achieve its forecast merger savings, keep
  most of them, and avoid adverse regulatory treatment, we
  believe Western will not maintain its dividend at the
  proposed level.  In fact, just last week Standard & Poor's,
  the national credit rating agency,  put Western on its
  CreditWatch list for possible downgrade, noting that the
  company is "a weak Single-A-minus utility with an average
  business position."  Also last week, Citizens' Utility
  Ratepayer Board (CURB) told Kansas regulators that it would
  "request more significant rate reductions" than those
  included in Western's latest proposal.  Such a decrease in
  Western's rates would undermine the value of its stock and
  inhibit Western's ability to maintain even its current
  dividend.

- -    Western's stock value in any merger with KCPL is
  speculative.  Western would have you believe that its
  proposal represents a current market value of $28 per KCPL
  share.  However, the market value of the shares you would
  receive pursuant to the Western proposal would be heavily
  influenced by Western's ability to achieve its inflated
  estimates of savings and by its optimistic assumption that
  regulators would allow it to retain a precedent-setting 70%
  of such savings.  The value of Western's shares may also be
  affected adversely by cuts in Western's utility rates, which
  are currently under review.

- -    Any KCPL/Western merger perpetuates the management
  challenge of concentration of business risk in one
  asset --Wolf Creek.  In contrast, the proposed merger with
  UtiliCorp would reduce this risk by half and contribute a
  diversified portfolio that would allow numerous avenues for
  future growth.

- -    Western's exaggerated claims go beyond the financial
  claims of its merger proposal.  In a thinly-veiled attempt
  to mollify community leaders and KCPL employees, Western has
  promised that there would be no layoffs in a KCPL/Western
  merger and that it would maintain three separate corporate
  headquarters.  These promises are incompatible with
  Western's need to maximize cost savings.

        THE KCPL/UTILICORP MERGER IS THE ONLY CHOICE

     Beyond all the questions raised about the specifics of
Western's proposal, there is a strategic issue here that is
of great concern to your Board.  Put simply, it is the stark
contrast between Western's vision of the future of the
utility industry and the vision embodied in our proposal to
merge with UtiliCorp.  Western's proposal is rooted in a
bygone era that fails to recognize the fundamental changes
taking place in our industry, heavily weighted as it is on
the side of cost synergies, critical mass and concentration
of assets and markets. Growth and the need to meet the
demands of a rapidly changing marketplace are neglected in
their proposal.

     Our proposal to merge with UtiliCorp has very tangible
short-term benefits in the form of real, substantive and
achievable cost savings.  We have documented more than $600
million in cost synergies that will be realized over the
next ten years.  However, the cornerstone of our proposal is
the ability to achieve sustainable, long-term growth in
shareholder value.  As a combined company, we will be able
to:

- -    Compete effectively in national and global markets;

- -    Have greater access to potential new customers and new
     markets;

- -    Use our size and stability to achieve enhanced access
     to capital markets;

- -    Introduce a new array of energy products and services;

- -    Reduce our cost structure through operational and
     purchasing efficiencies that will make us an even more
     formidable cost competitor;

- -    Provide a demonstrated track record in energy related
     non-regulated businesses.

     For all these reasons--and in consideration of the
risks of Western Resources' unsolicited proposal--your Board
strongly advises you to vote in favor of our combination
with UtiliCorp United.

                            Sincerely,

                            Drue Jennings
                            Chairman of the Board, President and
                            Chief Executive Officer

     To do so, just sign, date and return the accompanying
WHITE card, using the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope,
indicating your support of the Company's Board and
management.  Only your latest proxy card will be counted.
If you have any questions or need assistance in completing
the enclosed WHITE card, please call our proxy solicitor,
D.F. King & Co., Inc., toll free, at 1-800-714-3312.